Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The erroneous perceptual judgment can be explained as acc... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→What is experienced in an illusion is not identical with the physical object (e.g., the stick), but rather sense-data

    The erroneous perceptual judgment can be explained as accurately representing features presented in the sensory experience (i.e., bent-ness)

    Perception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Perception

    Related

    An illusion (e.g., a bent-looking stick) involves a distinctive sensory experien...If that which is experienced has a property the physical object lacks, then that...That which is experienced appears bentThe distinctive sensory experience is apt to give rise to an erroneous perceptua...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    +2 more
    Show less
    The physical stick is not in fact bentWhat is experienced in an illusion is not identical with the physical object (e....

    Similar

    The distinctive sensory experience is apt to give rise to an erroneous...88%In illusion cases, the sensory experience dictates an erroneous judgme...80%In the illusion case, the erroneous perceptual judgment is explained b...80%A judgment about one's body posture made on the basis of visual percep...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: austin-jl
    View source passageHide passage
    The distinction between sensory perception and judgmental acumen enables Austin to distinguish between central cases of illusion and central cases of delusion, and also to sketch explanations of what is going on in those cases that do not make appeal to sense-data. Austin takes the defender of (i) and (ii) to argue as follows. First, consider an illusion, for example a stick that looks bent but really isn’t. Such an illusion has two key features. First, it clearly involves a distinctive sensory

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective