Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The existence of a necessarily good God entails that evil must be explicable in terms of greater goods, transforming evil from brute fact to meaningful datum.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The amount and intensity of actual evil vastly exceeds what any plausible greater good could justify or require.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An omnipotent God could achieve any greater good without permitting evil, making evil's necessity claim logically unfounded.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Post-hoc rationalization of evil as 'meaningful' may reflect human psychological need rather than objective metaphysical truth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
A necessarily good God cannot permit evil without sufficient reason, so all permitted evil must serve purposes we can intelligibly recognize.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Meaning-making through greater goods (redemption, virtue development, free will) transforms arbitrary suffering into purposeful experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without divine explanation, evil remains unintelligible brute fact; theism offers coherent framework for understanding suffering's place in reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.