Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The existence of a single thinking subject entails the ex... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Skepticism about other minds is false

    The existence of a single thinking subject entails the existence of other thinking subjects

    Consciousness & MindSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Having thoughts with determinate content requires triangulation with at least one other thinking creature
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A subject that has no thoughts with determinate content has no thoughts at all
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The falsity of having no thoughts at all is self-evident for any thinking subject
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.A solitary mind could acquire determinate content through causal-sensory relations with a mind-independent physical world, not other minds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Fodor's informational semantics grounds content in nomic covariation between mental states and environmental properties without requiring social triangulation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If physical-causal grounding suffices for determinate content, Davidson's triangulation argument establishes intersubjectivity as contingent, not transcendentally necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Husserl's transcendental phenomenology demonstrates that a constituting ego can establish a coherent experiential world through internal temporal synthesis prior to encountering others.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Cartesian Meditations show other subjects are constituted as 'analogical apperceptions' of the primordial ego, making others epistemically derivative, not constitutively necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If otherness is constituted rather than presupposed, the entailment runs from self to other as a genetic achievement, not a logical precondition of thought.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    SkepticismConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language2 linkedPersonal Identity1 linked

    Related

    A solitary mind could acquire determinate content through causal-sensory relatio...A subject that has no thoughts with determinate content has no thoughts at allFodor's informational semantics grounds content in nomic covariation between men...Having thoughts with determinate content requires triangulation with at least on...
    +8 moreShow less
    Husserl's transcendental phenomenology demonstrates that a constituting ego can ...I am a thinking subjectIf otherness is constituted rather than presupposed, the entailment runs from se...If physical-causal grounding suffices for determinate content, Davidson's triang...

    Similar

    Physical objects do not exist independently of minds but consist solel...82%The only objects that exist for a mind are ideas, because there is not...80%The CVs' belief that mind-independent objects exist would therefore be...78%Without a distinct idea of existence, existence cannot be derived from...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transcendental-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    Finally, we may turn to the work of Donald Davidson, who like Putnam bases his transcendental claim on a form of externalism, which links the content of our mental states to how we relate to our environment; but in his case, this idea is directed against skepticism concerning other minds. Thus, while the skeptic holds that the existence of such minds is doubtful, Davidson argues that it would not be possible for a creature like me to have thoughts unless I lived in a world with other creatures w

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Skepticism about other minds is false
    The Cartesian Meditations show other subjects are constituted as 'analogical app...
    The falsity of having no thoughts at all is self-evident for any thinking subjec...
    Therefore other thinking subjects exist, contrary to the skeptic's doubt