Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The existence of a temptation toward error demonstrates human psychology, not facts about the external world being perceived.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some temptations toward error correlate with objective features—sugar tastes sweet because it triggers our reward systems, a fact about the world.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If temptations reveal only psychology, we cannot explain why certain illusions are systematic while others are rare or absent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Confusing psychology with external facts requires that the external world causally shapes our temptations—making world-facts explanatorily fundamental.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Optical illusions persist despite knowing the truth, showing our perceptual errors reflect brain structure, not world properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Different species perceive identical environments differently, suggesting temptations to error originate in cognitive architecture.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We can be tempted toward error about imperceptible things (atoms, dark matter), indicating temptation arises from internal processing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.