Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The existence of unfossilized evolutionary history predating any finite or absolute mind entails a nature that was real before mind emerged.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Unfossilized history cannot be directly observed; we only have present fossils and current physical laws, both mind-accessible data.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The inference from 'mind-independent processes now' to 'mind-independent past' assumes continuity that idealists can reject as unjustified.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Evolutionary history is a narrative interpretation of evidence, not raw data—narratives always depend on minds that construct them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Physical evidence (radiometric dating, geological strata) indicates natural processes operated for billions of years before conscious beings existed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If all reality were mind-dependent, the consistency and lawfulness of pre-conscious nature would require an implausibly omniscient cosmic mind.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Our best scientific theories succeed by treating physical systems as evolving independently of observation, suggesting mind-independent reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.