Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The exponentiation function grows at super-polynomial (ex... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Exponentiation is not provably total in IΔ_0

    The exponentiation function grows at super-polynomial (exponential) rate

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    All sources support it1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    1 linked

    Related

    All provably total functions of IΔ_0 are of polynomial rate of growthExponentiation is not provably total in IΔ_0

    Similar

    Exponentiation grows at a super-polynomial rate88%Exponentiation grows faster than any polynomial78%O(2^n) and all other super-polynomial rates of growth sit strictly abo...76%All provably total functions of IΔ₀ are of polynomial rate of growth74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    A first link between formal arithmetic and complexity was provided by Cobham’s (1965) original characterization of \(\textbf{FP}\) in terms of a functional algebra similar to that by which the primitive recursive functions are defined. 1 The function \(f(\vec{x},y)\) is said to be defined from \(g(\vec{x}), h_0(\vec{x},y,z), h_1(\vec{x},y,z)\) and \(k(\vec{x},y)\) by limited recursion on notation just in case \[ \begin{aligned} f(\vec{x},0) &= g(\vec{x})\\ f(\vec{x},s_0(y)) &= h_0(\v

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective