Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The federal center must hold sufficient powers to ensure the full benefits of union.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Proudhon's mutualist federalism holds that genuine union benefits emerge from voluntary contractual agreements between units, not centralized coercion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Powers granted to a center to 'ensure' benefits create institutional incentives to expand beyond commerce into domains that undermine the autonomy generating union's value.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Althusius demonstrated that subsidiary associations, not a sovereign center, are the historically primary locus of political authority in federated arrangements.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The logical structure of the supporting argument conflates a necessary condition for one benefit of union with sufficient justification for a general grant of central power.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Benefits of union include facilitated commerce across member units.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Frontier duties between member units obstruct commerce.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The federal center must have powers to prevent such frontier duties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.