Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The First must have no cause of any kind

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Logical or formal necessity can constitute a non-causal ground for existence without implying temporal or ontological priority over the necessary being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason requires that even a necessary being have a reason for its existence, namely its own essence, which grounds without causing it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A self-explanatory ground differs categorically from an external cause, so the First may have an internal rational ground without violating its primacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Plotinus's One is genuinely first yet 'overflows' into existence through a necessary emanative procession, suggesting the First can have an immanent generative principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An immanent generative principle internal to the First's nature does not constitute a cause in the efficient or final sense that would place something prior to the First.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Anything that is 'first' cannot have any kind of cause
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Any cause of the First would be prior to it
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If something is prior to the First, the First would not truly be first
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.