Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The first premise of the kalām argument (that everything that begins to exist has a cause) is true.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Quantum mechanics reveals that virtual particles and radioactive decay events occur without deterministic prior causes, per standard Copenhagen interpretation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If uncaused events occur within the universe, the Causal Principle is not a necessary metaphysical truth but an empirical generalization with known exceptions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An empirical generalization with known exceptions cannot serve as a universally reliable premise for deducing the cause of the universe's origin.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Our causal intuitions are formed exclusively through experience of objects arising within an already-existing spatiotemporal framework with prior conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Applying the concept 'begins to exist' and its associated causal principle to the universe as a whole — where no prior spatiotemporal framework exists — commits a category error identified by Kant as illegitimate extension of the understanding beyond possible experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A principle whose justification is entirely intra-cosmic experience cannot be projected without argument onto the genesis of the cosmos itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The Causal Principle is intuitively obvious; no one seriously denies it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The metaphysical intuition that something cannot come out of nothing supports the Causal Principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.No one sincerely believes that things, such as a horse or an Eskimo village, can just pop into being without a cause, and this includes the universe.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.