Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The fixity of the past is not grounded merely in causal intuitions but in the logical principle that what has occurred cannot be made not to have occurred.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The logical principle conflates semantic fixity (our statements about the past are determinate) with metaphysical fixity (past events cannot be different).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Open future theories suggest tenseless logic may not apply to time: 'occurred' itself presupposes a particular temporal metaphysics, not a neutral logical principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The argument begs the question by defining 'past' in ways that already assume fixity rather than deriving it from logical principles alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical contradictions cannot be true: 'X occurred and X did not occur' violates the law of non-contradiction regardless of causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The past's fixity follows from the meaning of 'past': by definition, past events have already become determinate and cannot retroactively alter.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even if we could causally influence the past, we cannot make true statements about it false, which shows fixity transcends causal possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42