Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Gödel completeness theorem establishes that the set o... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If the set of valid sentences of a language L is not definable in a simple fashion, then no meaningful completeness result can be established for L (L is incomplete).

    The Gödel completeness theorem establishes that the set of all valid formulas of any first-order language L can be generated from a simple set of axioms via straightforward inference rules.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Completeness theorem(as a mathematical result about logical systems)
    A result showing that for a certain type of logic (first-order logic), everything that is true can be proven using the logical rules—there's no gap between what's true and what can be demonstrated.
    First-order language(the type of logical system the theorem applies to)
    A formal system of logic that lets you make statements about objects and their properties, but doesn't let you make claims about claims themselves (which would be 'second-order').

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Gödel(as a historical figure in mathematical logic)
    Kurt Gödel was a 20th-century mathematician and logician who proved that any consistent formal system (a set of logical rules) is incomplete—meaning there are true statements it can't prove.
    Valid formulas(the focus of what the theorem proves)
    Statements written in the precise language of logic that are correctly formed and logically true—they follow the rules and make sense.
    axioms(Stumpf, 1891)
    Propositions that we assume to be true and necessary, originating in the content of judgments.
    inference rules(As used in the DIRT system by Lin and Pantel)
    Rules expressing approximate equivalence between relational phrases, such as 'X finds a solution to Y ≈ X solves Y', derived statistically from text corpora.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    A consequence of the completeness theorem is that, if formulas of L are coded as...If the set of valid sentences of a language L is not definable in a simple fashi...Therefore, completeness of a first-order language implies its set of valid sente...Turning this implication around: if the set of valid L-sentences is not definabl...

    Similar

    Therefore, completeness of a first-order language implies its set of v...86%Strong completeness establishes sufficiency for capturing logical cons...83%The completeness theorem establishes that proof and truth are extensio...83%By the completeness theorem for first-order logic, any consistent theo...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-infinitary
    View source passageHide passage
    Probably the most important result about first-order languages is the Gödel completeness theorem which of course says that the set of all valid formulas of any first-order language L can be generated from a simple set of axioms by means of a few straightforward rules of inference. A major consequence of this theorem is that, if the formulas of L are coded as natural numbers in some constructive way, then the set of (codes of) valid sentences is recursively enumerable. Thus, the completeness

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective