Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The good of libertarian free will requires the possibility of moral evil.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
God, being omnipotent, could have actualized a world where free agents always freely choose good, as Mackie argued in 'Evil and Omnipotence' (1955).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If such a world is logically possible, the necessity of permitting moral evil for the sake of free will collapses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Plantinga's free will defense applies only to moral evil, leaving natural evil—earthquakes, disease, child suffering—entirely unexplained by appeals to human freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A theodicy that accounts for only one category of evil while ignoring the other fails as a comprehensive defense of theism against the problem of evil.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
A world with libertarian free will is better than one without it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
God would have good reason to create such a world.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even God cannot ensure that no one with libertarian free will would ever choose moral wrongdoing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.