Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The harmony and order invoked as constitutive of goodness are themselves historically contingent valuations, not metaphysical facts.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If harmony's goodness is purely contingent, why do nearly all viable societies develop some normative preference for order over chaos?
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim itself presupposes a metaphysical fact: that contingency rather than necessity characterizes valuations—creating self-undermining circularity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Biological thriving across species correlates with functional order, suggesting harmony tracks mind-independent facts about flourishing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Different cultures across history valorize conflicting orderings (hierarchy vs. equality), showing 'harmony' lacks universal definition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Metaphysical facts are mind-independent; harmony's appeal depends on human consciousness valuing it, marking it as historically contingent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Scientific description of physical order (entropy, thermodynamics) doesn't entail any ethical goodness, separating fact from valuation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42