Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The human mind can only know the external world through species (mental representations) that resemble external things.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
William of Ockham argues that the intellect can cognize external particulars directly via intuitive cognition without any resembling intermediary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If direct acquaintance with a singular is possible, the species is an unnecessary ontological posit violating parsimony.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A resembling intermediary would make the external thing itself unknowable, since we would cognize the species rather than the thing it represents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Thomas Reid demonstrates that resemblance is not a necessary condition for representation, since signs can represent without resembling their objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If a mental state can refer to an external thing through causal or functional relations rather than likeness, the species theory's resemblance requirement is unmotivated.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Roger Bacon's theory holds that causal influence is transmitted through species multiplied from one thing to another.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A species is a likeness of its cause with a lesser or equal mode of being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Applying this causal model to epistemology, perception of external things must proceed through intermediate mental likenesses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.