Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The human mind possesses both an understanding (reason) and a set of lower cognitive faculties for indistinct insight into the connections of things.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's Critique of Pure Reason demonstrates that sensibility and understanding are irreducibly distinct faculties with no common cognitive root.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the faculties are irreducibly heterogeneous, no unified 'mind' can coherently possess both as graduated modes of a single cognitive capacity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Baumgarten's schema of 'lower' versus 'higher' cognition illegitimately presupposes a scalar continuum between what are in fact categorically different epistemic operations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Leibniz's own monadology entails that 'indistinct' perception is not a faculty but a privative condition of apperception, not a positive cognitive power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If indistinctness is merely the absence of reflective clarity rather than a separate faculty's output, the argument's P4 attributes agency to a mere cognitive deficiency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The human mind cognizes the interconnections of some things distinctly and of others indistinctly.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Having the capacity for both distinct and indistinct cognition entails possessing faculties suited to each mode.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Distinct insight into the connections of things constitutes reason (ratio).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.