Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Humean conflation of motivating states with propositi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Motivating reasons are mental states of agents, or facts about those states.

    The Humean conflation of motivating states with propositional content illicitly treats the vehicle of motivation as identical to its object.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Motivating states like desires have non-representational phenomenal properties distinct from what they represent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Treating vehicles as identical to content conflates the physical/mental substrate with its semantic content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A desire's felt quality can motivate behavior even when its propositional content remains unclear or unstated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Motivating states necessarily have propositional structure; desires are always 'desires that' or 'desires for X'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction between vehicle and content is metaphysically unclear; motivation requires representational content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hume's account successfully explains motivation without requiring the vehicle-content distinction the critic invokes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    A desire's felt quality can motivate behavior even when its propositional conten...Hume's account successfully explains motivation without requiring the vehicle-co...Motivating reasons are mental states of agents, or facts about those states.Motivating states like desires have non-representational phenomenal properties d...
    +3 moreShow less
    Motivating states necessarily have propositional structure; desires are always '...The distinction between vehicle and content is metaphysically unclear; motivatio...Treating vehicles as identical to content conflates the physical/mental substrat...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit