Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Humean view holds that we simply cannot tell in advan... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→We cannot determine in advance what causal relations obtain in nature, so explanatory variables for psychotic or affective phenomena need not be exclusively cognitive or biological.

    The Humean view holds that we simply cannot tell in advance of inquiry what causal relations obtain in nature.

    CausationSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind4 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Anything can cause anything.Decades of research have revealed that mental illness is caused by, and causes i...It is equally unwarranted to adopt simple reductionism and insist explanatory va...It is unwarranted to suppose that relevant explanatory variables for psychotic o...
    +1 moreShow less
    We cannot determine in advance what causal relations obtain in nature, so explan...

    Similar

    We can have no certain knowledge of causal relations.82%Standard causal relations do not hold between an object and itself80%There is no prospect of our being able to determine the nature of thin...80%Therefore, humans cannot draw meaningful conclusions about the nature ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: psychiatry
    View source passageHide passage
    The debate here quickly gets into technical arguments about the concept of causation. Campbell argues against Frith in favour of the Humean idea that we simply cannot tell in advance of inquiry what causal relations obtain in nature. Anything can cause anything and it is just as unwarranted to suppose that the relevant explanatory variables for psychotic or affective phenomena must be cognitive as it is to adopt a simple reductionism and insist on their being biological. Decades of research have

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective