Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The individualist restriction leads to a clearly false co... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The individualist restriction leads to a clearly false conclusion in Parfit's Case Four.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.In Parfit's Case Four, if we do nothing, everyone including Blue suffers 100 days of pain.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The individualist restriction instructs us to relieve Blue of all 100 days rather than relieve everyone (including Blue) of 10 days each.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Choosing to relieve only Blue while leaving all others in full suffering is clearly the wrong choice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentConsequentialism

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Choosing to relieve only Blue while leaving all others in full suffering is clea...In Parfit's Case Four, if we do nothing, everyone including Blue suffers 100 day...The individualist restriction instructs us to relieve Blue of all 100 days rathe...

    Similar

    Contractualism with the individualist restriction diverges from utilit...86%The individualist restriction prohibits aggregating reasons across dif...84%The individualist restriction instructs us to relieve Blue of all 100 ...77%The only permissible restrictions on individual liberty are those that...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    The individualist restriction enables contractualism to diverge from utilitarianism in this case. Because the other people’s reasons cannot be aggregated, they cannot ever outweigh Blue’s reason. But opponents of the individualist restriction will object that this is a coincidence. The real reason we should treat Blue is not because Blue’s burden would otherwise be greater, but because Blue would otherwise be so much worse-off. For instance, suppose instead that, if we do nothing, everyone (Blue
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit