Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The inference from correlation between solar rotation rate and planetary speeds to a motive emanation is a post hoc fallacy without an independently established transmission mechanism.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Strong correlations between independent physical systems sometimes warrant investigation even before mechanisms are understood.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Rejecting all correlations without mechanism can prevent discovery—gravity was dismissed until mechanism was later theorized.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates 'not yet explained' with 'fallacious'—unexplained correlation may indicate real phenomenon requiring investigation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Post hoc reasoning requires showing correlation alone cannot establish causation without mechanistic explanation of causal pathway.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.History of science shows many spurious correlations were defended until transmission mechanisms were identified or disproven.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Claiming motive emanation without specifying what medium transmits force violates basic standards of physical explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.