Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The inference 'If Socrates is a human being, Socrates is ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The inference 'If Socrates is a human being, Socrates is an animal' is not formally valid

    The inference 'If Socrates is a human being, Socrates is an animal' does not hold under uniform substitution (substituting arbitrary species and genus terms need not preserve truth)

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Key Terms

    Socrates
    Socrates was an ancient Greek philosopher who lived in Athens around 470-399 BCE and is considered one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He didn't write books himself, but taught by asking people questions to help them discover truth and examine their own beliefs—a method now called the "Socratic method" that's still used in education today. He was eventually put on trial and executed by the Athenian government, becoming a martyr for free thinking and the pursuit of wisdom.
    Species and genus terms(in logical classification)
    Ways of categorizing things: 'genus' is a broad group (like 'animal'), and 'species' is a smaller group within it (like 'human').

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Uniform Substitution
    A rule whereby a formula of the form A(B/p) is a theorem whenever A is a theorem, provided that B is free for p in A.
    animal(Valla's restricted use of 'animal' as a category in his revised ontological classification, explicitly excluding God and angels.)
    Creatures that consist of both body and soul; beings with embodied, animate natures.
    human being(Second type of group-based account of moral status)
    A thick normative concept, grounded in language and social practice, that is not necessarily coextensive with the biological category of Homo sapiens and whose moral content cannot be derived from any descriptive attribute.
    inference(Nyāya epistemology)
    A component of epistemology in Nyāya philosophy; a veritable inference yields knowledge about the world and must have premises that are themselves known
    preserve truth(as used in logic and translation theory)
    To keep a statement's truth value the same—if the original sentence is true, the translated version should also be true, and if it's false, it should remain false.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Formal validity requires that an inference hold under uniform substitution of te...The inference 'If Socrates is a human being, Socrates is an animal' is not forma...

    Similar

    The inference 'If Socrates is a human being, Socrates is an animal' is...92%The inference 'If Socrates is a human being, Socrates is an animal' ho...89%The inference 'Only a man is a donkey, therefore every donkey is a man...82%The inference 'Only a man is a donkey, therefore every donkey is a man...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: abelard
    View source passageHide passage
    There is another way in which conclusions can be necessary and relevant to their premisses, yet not be formally valid (not be a complete entailment). The necessary connection among the propositions, and the link among their senses, might be a function of non-formal metaphysical truths holding in all possible worlds. For instance, human beings are a kind of animal, so the consequence ‘If Socrates is a human being, Socrates is an animal’ holds of necessity and the sense of the antecedent compels t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective