Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The intellect does not undergo qualitative change when br... — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The intellect is immaterial.

    The intellect does not undergo qualitative change when brought to act — it is merely actualized.

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Something is passive in a fundamental sense when it undergoes qualitative change...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The intellect is immaterial.
    Therefore, the intellect is not passive in the fundamental (material) sense, and...

    Similar

    The intellect receives forms but does not undergo qualitative change.89%The human intellect requires an active intellect (always in act, never...82%The human intellect is in potency and moves to act.80%The active intellect is always in act and never in potency.80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: simon-faversham
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Simon, the intellect is the faculty of the rational soul whereby it thinks. Simon, who follows the Aristotelian doctrine closely, holds this faculty to be immaterial, passive, and separate. It is separate because it does not need to use an organ in order to perform its operation of intellection. It is also passive, but not in the same sense matter is passive. In fact, there are two senses in which something is passive: it can receive forms with or without undergoing qualitative chan

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective