Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The internal argument is the constituent that combines wi... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→'boy' is the internal argument of 'every' in 'every boy sang'

    The internal argument is the constituent that combines with a functor to form a phrase

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    'boy' is the internal argument of 'every' in 'every boy sang''every boy' forms a phrase

    Similar

    A relation being internal to an entity means only that the related ter...76%

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    All reasoning, on Carnap's view, presupposes internality to a framewor...73%
    The internalist denies that giving the content of an expression primar...73%
    If a central premise of an argument conflates distinct concepts, disti...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logical-form
    View source passageHide passage
    Since ‘\(x\)’ and ‘\(y\)’ are variables ranging over individuals, one can say that the function indicated by the transitive verb ‘likes’ yields the value T given the ordered pair \(\langle x,y \rangle\) as argument if and only if \(x\) likes \(y\). In this notational scheme, ‘\(y\)’ corresponds to the direct object (or internal argument), which combines with the verb to form a phrase; ‘\(x\)’ corresponds to the grammatical subject (or external argument) of the verb. If we think about ‘every boy

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective