Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The intuitive judgment that parents are owed more concern than others has great plausibility
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Moral concern grounded in causal origin commits a genetic fallacy: the source of a benefit does not determine its moral weight.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Parents who fulfill biological roles without genuine care or virtue have weaker claims to filial concern than non-relatives who nurture well.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Confucians like Mozi argued that partial concern for kin over strangers produces social harm that universally impartial care would prevent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kantian ethics holds that moral obligations derive from rational agency and dignity, which all persons possess equally regardless of relational proximity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Privileging parents as a class entrenches morally arbitrary features—birth and biological connection—as grounds for differential treatment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Parents are the source of one's life and nurturance
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Being the source of one's life and nurturance grounds a stronger obligation of concern
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.