Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Khazar king recognizes there is no compelling evidenc... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The existence and authority of a king cannot be established through syllogistic argument alone when only indirect evidence (such as the justice of a people) is available, warranting suspension of judgment.

    The Khazar king recognizes there is no compelling evidence or argument to establish that the justice of India's people is due to their king.

    Natural TheologySkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismNatural Theology

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The Khazar king recognizes there is no compelling evidence that India even has a...The existence and authority of a king cannot be established through syllogistic ...Without compelling evidence, the rational response is to suspend judgment rather...

    Similar

    The Khazar king recognizes there is no compelling evidence that India ...89%There is doubt about whether India's people's justice is entirely of t...82%The Khazar king is not compelled to revere the ruler of India merely u...82%Appeal to nonexistent kings (such as a present king of France, since F...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: halevi
    View source passageHide passage
    It is only after the king has expressed himself in this way that the sage begins to suggest that the entire thought experiment is parabolical and that the king has, in effect, endorsed the rationality and appropriateness of the sage's opening remarks. The endorsement was in his having responded to the unanticipated diplomatic mission to his court with all its concomitant benefits just as the biblical Israelites responded to the unanticipated mission and extraordinary benefits that came their way

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective