Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The knowledge argument therefore establishes only a difference in modes of access to physical information, not a gap in the physical information itself.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If Mary gains genuinely new knowledge upon seeing red, that knowledge constitutes new information not contained in physical facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Subjective phenomenal experience (qualia) exhibits properties—like intrinsic redness—that physical descriptions cannot capture or exhaust.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The difference between Mary's epistemic states before and after represents a real gap in what physical information can provide.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Mary learns no new physical facts about color wavelengths; she only gains ability to recognize those facts through direct experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
All information Mary acquires in the room is ultimately reducible to physical properties of light, neurology, and brain states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction between 'knowing that' and 'knowing how' explains why new subjective access doesn't entail new physical content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.