Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The locution 'discernible in two natures' ought to be abandoned in Christological discourse.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The term 'nature' has two applications: universal (e.g., the nature of man in general) and particular (e.g., the nature of this individual man).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.When speaking of two natures unified in Christ, the reference cannot be to universal natures, because universal natures apply to the Father and the Spirit equally — which would entail that the Father and Spirit also became man.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore the reference must be to particular natures — the particular nature of the divine Logos and the particular nature of Jesus the man.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Trinity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.