Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The logical incompatibility thesis is thus vindicated: th... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The logical incompatibility thesis leads to the implausible implication that any game in which a rule is broken ends at the point of rule-breaking

    The logical incompatibility thesis is thus vindicated: the false-start scenario shows the race did end at transgression, and what continues is a new or resumed game-instance, not the original one.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    False-start scenario(Used as an example to prove the logical incompatibility thesis)
    A situation where something begins but then stops or resets, like a race where runners have to go back to the starting line and begin again.
    Game-instance(The statement distinguishes between a new game-instance and the original one)
    A single occurrence or round of a game—like one specific game you play, as opposed to the game in general.
    Transgression(as used in ethics and cultural studies)
    An action that violates a rule, law, or moral code—essentially breaking something you're not supposed to break.
    Vindicated(as used to describe whether a claim can be supported)
    Proven to be correct or justified based on evidence or reasoning.
    logical incompatibility thesis

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (philosophical argument against cheating)
    The thesis that rule-breaking is not compatible with game playing because game playing requires strict adherence to the rules

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    The logical incompatibility thesis leads to the implausible implication that any...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective