Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The magnitude estimation task probably provides only interval-level data, the same as other judgment tasks

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Recent formalizations of magnitude estimation in the psychophysics literature specify that magnitude estimation requires ratio judgments
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Experimental evidence shows participants cannot make genuine ratio judgments of acceptability (e.g., judging one sentence as precisely half as acceptable as another)
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If participants cannot make ratio judgments, the magnitude estimation task cannot provide ratio-level data
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.