Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The maxim 'end life to prevent greater suffering' can be universalized without logical contradiction, as Hume argues in 'Of Suicide'.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Universalizability is a necessary but insufficient condition for moral permissibility; logical consistency ≠ ethical rightness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A maxim permitting suicide under suffering could destabilize social trust and mutual aid systems if truly universalized in practice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Hume's skepticism about metaphysical arguments doesn't establish that suicide-to-prevent-suffering can be consistently universalized.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If a maxim can be universalized without logical contradiction, it passes Kantian/Humean rational consistency tests.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Universal permission to end life when suffering exceeds bearable limits contains no internal logical inconsistency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Hume's critique of theological objections to suicide removes the primary barrier to treating it as rationally permissible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.