Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The mere existence of evil cannot be incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect being.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The quantity and distribution of suffering in the world vastly exceeds what any plausible greater-good justification could require.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An omnipotent being, by definition, could achieve any greater good through means that do not require gratuitous suffering as a logical precondition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the existence of gratuitous evil—suffering serving no outweighing good—remains logically incompatible with omnipotence, omniscience, and moral perfection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Rowe's inductive argument establishes that specific evils, such as the prolonged suffering of Bambi or Sue, appear to serve no greater good detectable by careful reflection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A morally perfect being with full knowledge and unlimited power would have compelling reason to prevent any evil whose prevention does not undermine a necessary outweighing good.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The persistent existence of such apparently pointless evils shifts the burden of proof decisively onto the theist, making the claim that evil is compatible with God epistemically unjustified.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The actuality or at least the possibility of certain undesirable states of affairs may be logically necessary for goods that outweigh them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If undesirable states of affairs are logically necessary for outweighing goods, then the mere existence of evil is not incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.