Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The mind-as-physical-symbol-system view is undermined by ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The mind-as-physical-symbol-system view is undermined by connectionist models

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Connectionist models have demonstrated capacity to perform cognitively interesting tasks
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If connectionist (non-symbolic) models can perform cognitively interesting tasks, the physical symbol system hypothesis is not necessary to explain cognition
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Connectionist models have demonstrated capacity to perform cognitively interesti...If connectionist (non-symbolic) models can perform cognitively interesting tasks...

    Similar

    If connectionist (non-symbolic) models can perform cognitively interes...88%Searle's argument that anything mapping onto a formal system is a form...72%Therefore, no mind can be identical to the realizing system; minds mus...72%Russellian monism fails to adequately integrate consciousness into phy...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: computational-linguistics
    View source passageHide passage
    From one perspective, the renewal of interest in connectionism and neural modeling was a natural step in the endeavor to elaborate abstract notions of cognitive content and functioning to the point where they can make testable contact with brain theory and neuroscience. But it can also be seen as a paradigm shift, to the extent that the focus on subsymbolic processing began to be linked to a growing skepticism concerning higher-level symbolic processing as models of mind, of the sort associated
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit