Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The moral difference between intentionally throwing a bri... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The moral difference between intentionally throwing a brick at a person and negligently throwing a brick without checking for bystanders is not expressible in a probability calculus.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Intentionally throwing a brick at a person from a height is a distinct moral act from throwing a brick without checking whether anyone is below.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A probability calculus treats actions as probabilistic mixtures of outcomes and cannot capture the moral distinction between intentional harm and negligent risk imposition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityJustice & Punishment

    Key Terms

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Expressible(in logic and language)
    Able to be stated or written out in a particular logical language or system.
    Intentionally(as used in ethics)
    Doing something on purpose, with full awareness and deliberate choice.
    Moral difference(in ethics)
    A situation where two things are considered right or wrong, good or bad in different ways—for example, helping someone versus hurting them.
    Negligently(in ethics and responsibility)
    Acting carelessly or without paying proper attention to what you should be doing.
    Probability calculus(as a mathematical framework)
    A mathematical system of rules for calculating and working with probabilities, designed so that everything stays logically consistent.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    A probability calculus treats actions as probabilistic mixtures of outcomes and ...Intentionally throwing a brick at a person from a height is a distinct moral act...

    Similar

    Intentionally throwing a brick at a person from a height is a distinct...86%A probability calculus treats actions as probabilistic mixtures of out...81%The moral value of an action does not depend on mere chance or acciden...74%An agent who intends harm but accidentally produces good (e.g., intend...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: risk
    View source passageHide passage
    Examples are easily found that exhibit the problematic nature of this division between the two disciplines. Compare the act of throwing down a brick on a person from a high building to the act of throwing down a brick from a high building without first making sure that there is nobody beneath who can be hit by the brick. The moral difference between these two acts is not obviously expressible in a probability calculus. An ethical analysis of the difference will have to refer to the moral aspects
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit