Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The moral permissibility of a self-regarding act cannot be established solely by appealing to the absence of blame for lesser omissions of the same duty.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If lesser omissions are blameless, the duty's stringency cannot justify condemning the act.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Moral permissibility often depends on comparative standards: what matters is meeting reasonable expectations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates different things: blame-worthiness and permissibility aren't strictly separable categories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Permissibility requires positive justification, not mere absence of blame for partial failures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Lesser omissions may be blameworthy but still leave the act itself morally impermissible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A duty's comparative violation doesn't establish that satisfying it less fully makes the act permissible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.