Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The moral quality of an action is determined instrumentally, not intrinsically.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Kant's categorical imperative demonstrates that some actions (e.g., lying, torture) are wrong regardless of consequences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If an action's wrongness were purely instrumental, universalizable maxims would be impossible, yet rational agency demands them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moral obligations derived from rational form, not outcome, are prior to and independent of empirical effects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Ross's prima facie duties (fidelity, non-maleficence) carry intrinsic moral weight not reducible to their causal consequences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The wrongness of promise-breaking persists even in cases where breaking a promise produces marginally better outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Actions that are wrong are wrong in virtue of their effects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
There is no particular kind of action that is intrinsically wrong.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.