Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The more one sins, the more their volitional capacities are lost
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
People often exhibit greater volitional resolve *after* moral failure than before, suggesting sin can trigger self-correction rather than diminish capacity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim confuses habituation with loss of capacity; one retains the ability to choose otherwise even if past choices make it psychologically harder.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Many individuals with extensive moral failings demonstrate remarkable volitional reformation, contradicting a deterministic link between sin and lost agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Repeated sinful choices create neural pathways and habits that narrow deliberative options and diminish reflective capacity over time.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Sin involves willing against one's rational understanding of the good, and habitual such willing erodes the integrated self-governance needed for free choice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Addiction and compulsive behavior—natural consequences of repeated transgression—demonstrably constrain volitional control and authentic agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.