Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The necessary being is something other than the universe.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
The universe as a whole may possess necessary existence even if each constituent part is contingent, as wholes can have properties their parts lack.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Spinoza's substance monism demonstrates a coherent metaphysical framework in which the totality of nature (Deus sive Natura) is itself the necessary being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The inference from 'composed of contingent parts' to 'is itself contingent' commits the fallacy of composition, which Kant identified as a core error in cosmological arguments.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A set of contingent elements can form a necessarily self-sustaining causal structure if the members collectively ground each other's existence without remainder.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
A necessary being exists.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The universe, which is composed of only contingent beings, is contingent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.