Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The New York sugary beverage tax applied to soda but not ... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Policies that single out certain behaviors as irresponsible health decisions are undermotivated or discriminatory

    The New York sugary beverage tax applied to soda but not to more expensive but equally sugary beverages such as frappuccinos, demonstrating disparate impact

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty

    Connections

    1 topic

    Bioethics3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Behaviors often condemned as irresponsible health decisions in public health pol...Once the myriad ways in which individuals impose health costs on one another is ...Policies that single out certain behaviors as irresponsible health decisions are...

    Similar

    A soda tax is illegitimate under the restrictive motivational-set conc...70%The manufacturer of the ginger beer was liable for damages to the cons...64%This replicates the verdict of a prohibition dilemma in which all of A...64%The objective burden on Bakke under either policy is not significantly...61%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: publichealth-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    Many, however, object to these lines of argument. Some grant that individuals are responsible for their risky health decisions but deny that this licenses the conclusion that justice requires the sorts of policies just described. These critics articulate alternative ways for people to bear the costs of their decisions, including, for example, allowing people who engage in risky behaviors to self-insure in some way (Flanigan 2014b). A different line of argument, specific to the financing of healt

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective