Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The objection to mind-body interaction relies on a 'billi... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If causation is understood as ethereal force, energy transfer, or constant conjunction rather than impact, there is no principled obstacle to mind-body interaction.

    The objection to mind-body interaction relies on a 'billiard ball' (impact-based) model of causation.

    CausationConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindCausation

    Related

    Alternative models of causation — ethereal force, energy, or constant conjunctio...If causation is understood as ethereal force, energy transfer, or constant conju...Under these alternative models, the immaterial and material can stand in the rel...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    If causation operates by impact alone, mind-body interaction is imposs...85%The 'billiard ball' picture holds that all causation is by impact.83%If causation is understood as ethereal force, energy transfer, or cons...81%The interaction principle requires that mental events causally interac...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: dualism
    View source passageHide passage
    The simplest objection to interaction is that, in so far as mental properties, states or substances are of radically different kinds from each other, they lack that communality necessary for interaction. It is generally agreed that, in its most naive form, this objection to interactionism rests on a ‘billiard ball’ picture of causation: if all causation is by impact, how can the material and the immaterial impact upon each other? But if causation is either by a more ethereal force or energy or o

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective