Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The occurrence of rare, unusual, or extraordinary events does not demonstrate that the laws of nature have been violated

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.C.S. Lewis and Richard Swinburne argue that laws of nature are descriptive regularities, not governing necessities, so divine intervention adds an uncaused event rather than violating a prescription.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If laws of nature merely describe what happens absent supernatural intervention, then an extraordinary event caused by a personal agent logically supplements rather than contradicts those laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Identifying an event as a miracle requires prior theological commitments, not ignorance, as Swinburne's evidential framework in 'The Concept of Miracle' demonstrates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The methodological principle that hidden natural causes exist cannot be established without presupposing the very uniformity of nature it is meant to support.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Hume himself demonstrated in the Treatise that the uniformity of nature cannot be rationally justified, undermining appeals to it as a defeater for miracle claims.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.When irregular and extraordinary events occur, closer examination generally uncovers hidden or concealed natural causes
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Our experience shows that nature is uniform and regular
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Concluding that the laws of nature are violated from extraordinary events reflects ignorance and credulity, not sound reasoning
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.