Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The ontological argument eliminates the second alternativ... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The ontological argument eliminates the second alternative — that God is possible but may or may not exist.

    Modality & PossibilityNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.There are three logical alternatives: God is impossible, God is contingently possible, or God exists necessarily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God is possible, God cannot exist merely contingently, because contingent existence is incompatible with preeminence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, if God is possible at all, God exists necessarily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyModality & Possibility

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    If God is possible, God cannot exist merely contingently, because contingent exi...There are three logical alternatives: God is impossible, God is contingently pos...Therefore, if God is possible at all, God exists necessarily.

    Similar

    The ontological argument's claim that God necessarily exists cannot be...85%The ontological argument for God's existence is unsound.85%It remains an open question whether some hitherto undiscovered ontolog...85%No known ontological argument for the existence of God is persuasive.84%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: hartshorne
    View source passageHide passage
    On Hartshorne’s view, metaphysics does not deal with realities beyond the physical, but rather with those features of reality that are ubiquitous or that would exist in any possible world. And he does not think that it is possible to think of a preeminent being that existed only contingently since if it did exist contingently rather than necessarily, it would not be preeminent. That is, God’s existence is either impossible (positivism) or possible, and, if possible, then necessary (theism). He i
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit