Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The order of most past experiences cannot be ascertained ... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The argument for requiring external reference to order past experiences should be restricted to those experiences whose order cannot be determined by single-span memories.

    The order of most past experiences cannot be ascertained by means of single-span memories.

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    Single memories can accurately determine the order of only some past experiences...The argument for requiring external reference to order past experiences should b...The argument should cover those experiences we can correctly order but not via s...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Single memories can accurately determine the order of only some past e...92%There must be something by reference to which I can correlate remember...84%I am aware of the specific temporal order of many of my past experienc...84%The argument should cover those experiences we can correctly order but...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-transcendental
    View source passageHide passage
    Several points of interpretation should be noted. First, it is generally agreed that the notion of awareness in Premise (1) should be interpreted as a success notion, i.e., that to be aware that I have experiences that occur in a specific temporal order is to correctly determine that they occur in this order (Allison 1983: 290ff, Guyer 1987: 293ff, Dicker 2004, 195ff., 2008; Chignell 2010). Second, most commentators concur that the experiences at issue are my past experiences. Guyer suggests tha

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective