Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The ordinance allowed courts to award and enforce injunct... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The MacKinnon-Dworkin ordinance was functionally equivalent to censorship in practice

    The ordinance allowed courts to award and enforce injunctions against publication of material demonstrated to be harmful

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & Liberty

    Related

    Enforced injunctions against publication produce the same practical effect as pr...The MacKinnon-Dworkin ordinance was functionally equivalent to censorship in pra...

    Similar

    The MacKinnon-Dworkin ordinance was functionally equivalent to censors...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    80%
    Enforced injunctions against publication produce the same practical ef...79%
    Mill permits some forms of offense regulation to prevent public indece...71%
    Mill holds a blanket prohibition on regulating conduct merely because ...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pornography-censorship
    View source passageHide passage
    In 1983, two of the most prominent anti-pornography feminists in the United States, Catharine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin, drafted an anti-pornography ordinance at the behest of the Minneapolis Council. A similar ordinance was passed by the Indianapolis City Council in 1984, but later overturned on appeal by the U.S. Supreme Court on the grounds that the ordinance violated pornographers’ First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Importantly, the ordinance did not seek to impose criminal prohi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective