Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The 'ought implies can' principle entails only that the highest good must be possible, not that any particular agent must believe it is achievable.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Practical normativity requires agents to guide their actions; moral demands disconnected from perceived possibility are motivationally inert.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The principle's purpose is to protect agents from impossible demands; ignoring subjective impossibility defeats this protective function entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An agent cannot rationally 'ought' to pursue what they cannot even conceive as achievable, making the distinction between objective and believed possibility false.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral principles must apply universally; not all agents have equal capacities, so obligations cannot depend on individual beliefs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.'Ought' prescribes what is objectively required, while 'can' constrains only what is metaphysically possible, not psychologically apparent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If duties required individual belief in achievability, moral systems would collapse into relativism based on subjective confidence levels.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.