Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The particular examples of infeasible numbers put forward... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Strict finitists anticipated the complexity-theoretic insight that exponentiation marks the boundary between the feasible and the infeasible.

    The particular examples of infeasible numbers put forward by Yessenin-Volpin and others use exponential or iterated exponential notations such as n₁^n₂ or n₁^(n₂^n₃).

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Proof of definition segments1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    In complexity theory, polynomial (sub-exponential) orders of growth are feasible...Strict finitists anticipated the complexity-theoretic insight that exponentiatio...Van Dantzig (1955) held that feasible numbers are closed under addition and mult...Yessenin-Volpin (1970) explicitly stated that feasible numbers should not be reg...

    Similar

    The paradigmatic examples of infeasible numbers put forward by strict ...95%The paradigm examples of infeasible numbers given by strict finitists ...89%From (S2), some expression τ such as 10^12 does not denote a feasible ...71%PA^F contains ¬F(τ) where τ is a fixed primitive recursive term denoti...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    If we regard such expressions as tokens rather than types, then it makes sense to consider the task of concretely ‘counting up to’ a number by constructing its unary representation in the sense described by Yessenin-Volpin. g. the unary numerals are generated by applying the formation rule \(\sigma \mapsto \sigma'\) to the initial symbol \(0\). e. [49] In attempting to accommodate (S1)–(S3) simultaneously, we must confront a tension which has led many authors to follow Dummett (1975) in conclu

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective