Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The passages in Russell (1908) and Whitehead and Russell ... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The passages in Russell (1908) and Whitehead and Russell (1910–13) that appear to state a sentential semantics for propositional functions should not be regarded as precise statements of a semantics.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The passages in question appear to involve confusions of use and mention or related confusions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Such confusions may be merely careless rather than deliberate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Statements involving careless use-mention confusions are not reliable as precise semantic commitments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Key Terms

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Russell
    # Russell Russell most commonly refers to **Bertrand Russell**, a highly influential British philosopher, logician, and social critic (1872-1970) who fundamentally changed how we think about logic, language, and knowledge. He's famous for showing that common-sense reasoning can contain hidden contradictions and for arguing that philosophy should use the precision of mathematics to solve problems. Russell also became a prominent public intellectual who wrote about everything from religion to nuclear weapons, making him one of the most important thinkers of the 20th century.
    Sentential semantics(as the type of theory being examined)
    A theory about what sentences mean and how they get their meaning—specifically, how the meaning of whole sentences relates to logic and truth.
    Whitehead and Russell(as co-authors of an influential philosophical work)
    Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell collaborated on a groundbreaking three-volume work called 'Principia Mathematica' that tried to show how all of mathematics could be built from logical principles.
    propositional functions(PM's logical system)
    A foundational element of the logic of Principia Mathematica (PM), distinct from Frege's use of concepts (functions from objects to truth values)
    semantics(Distinguished from metasemantics and pragmatics in Kaplan 1989)
    The domain that concerns the facts about what meanings words or phrases have.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Related

    Statements involving careless use-mention confusions are not reliable as precise...Such confusions may be merely careless rather than deliberate.The passages in question appear to involve confusions of use and mention or rela...

    Similar

    A coherent semantics of Russell's formalized language cannot be provid...79%Frege held that propositions have parts that correspond to functions.76%If values of propositional functions are sentences, then sentences mus...75%Mental contents require genuine semantics, not merely syntactic manipu...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: logical-construction
    View source passageHide passage
    Many passages in [(Russell 1908)] and [(Whitehead and Russell 1910–13)] may be understood as saying or as having the consequence that the values of propositional functions are sentences. But a coherent semantics of Russell’s formalized language can hardly be provided on this basis (notice in particular, that, since sentences are also substituted for propositional variables, it would be necessary to take sentences as names of sentences.) And since the passages in question seem to involve confusio
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit