Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The perfect nature provides an argument for ultimate truth. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The dependent nature and the imaginary nature together explain Yogācāra's conventional reality, while the perfect nature explains Yogācāra's conception of ultimate reality.

    The perfect nature provides an argument for ultimate truth.

    Divine AttributesTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    The dependent and imaginary natures provide arguments for the empirical and prac...The dependent nature and the imaginary nature together explain Yogācāra's conven...The three natures in Yogācāra philosophy are the dependent nature, the imaginary...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The perfect nature is the ultimate truth of the dharmas89%The perfect nature is the ultimate (paramārtha)89%Ultimate nature entails ultimate truth87%Conventional nature entails conventional truth and ultimate nature ent...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: twotruths-india
    View source passageHide passage
    So, as we can see the dependent and the imaginary natures together explain the Yogācāra’s conventional reality and the perfect nature explains its conception of the ultimate reality. The first two natures provide an argument for the Yogācāra’s empirical and practical standpoints (vyavahāra), conventional truth and the third nature an argument for its ultimate truth. Even then the dependent nature alone is conventionally real and the perfect nature alone is ultimately real. By contrast, the imagi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective