The 'perfections' framework assumes a homogeneous causalontology that emergentist accounts, from Mill's 'heteropathic laws' to contemporary philosophy of mind, systematically reject.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
An influential 19th-century British philosopher who argued that scientific knowledge comes from careful observation and gathering evidence from the world.
Mill's 'heteropathic laws'(a historical example of emergentist thinking)
An idea from philosopher John Stuart Mill about how different elements can combine in unique ways that produce unexpected results, rather than just adding up in straightforward ways.
Ontology(Carnap argues this enterprise is based on a mistake)
The philosophical discipline that tries to answer hard questions about what there really is.
Perfections framework(the main subject being criticized in the statement)
A philosophical approach that tries to explain reality by saying certain properties or qualities are 'perfect' and fundamental to how things work.
Systematically reject(describing how emergentists treat the perfections framework)
Carefully and thoroughly argue against something as part of a larger, organized position.