Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The person's subjectivity and lived experience are knowable, though not through standard objective methods

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Thomas Nagel's 'what it is like' argument establishes that the qualitative character of subjective experience is constitutively inaccessible from any third-person or intersubjective standpoint.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Husserl's phenomenological method of eidetic reduction still operates through intersubjective structures of intentionality, making it a third-personal method in disguise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the 'method of disclosure' invoked in P2 cannot escape the epistemic barrier Nagel identifies without collapsing back into objective description.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Wittgenstein's private language argument demonstrates that genuinely private subjective states cannot be the basis of any communicable or verifiable knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If subjective experience cannot be linguistically shared or publicly verified, no method—phenomenological or otherwise—can yield knowledge of it in any epistemically robust sense.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The irreducibility of personhood does not entail that the person's subjectivity is unknowable
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A method that merely reveals and discloses essence is available for coming to know subjective experience
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.