Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The positivistic model of rationality alienates human bei... — Carmelics
    Home/Environmental Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The narrow positivistic and instrumentalist model of rationality should be replaced with a more humanistic model of rationality.

    The positivistic model of rationality alienates human beings from nature and from their own inner nature.

    Environmental Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Environmental Ethics

    Related

    A humanistic model of rationality incorporates the values of aesthetic, moral, s...Alienation from nature and from inner human nature is undesirable and should be ...The narrow positivistic and instrumentalist model of rationality should be repla...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Environmental Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The narrow positivistic and instrumentalist model of rationality shoul...81%A humanistic model of rationality incorporates the values of aesthetic...77%Genuine concern for nature as an end in itself is not reducible to hum...74%Alienation from nature and from inner human nature is undesirable and ...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-environmental
    View source passageHide passage
    The progress in knowledge and material well-being may not be a bad thing in itself, where the consumption and control of nature is a necessary part of human life. However, the critical theorists argue that the positivistic disenchantment of natural things (and, likewise, of human beings—because they too can be studied and manipulated by science) disrupts our relationship with them, encouraging the undesirable attitude that they are nothing more than things to be probed, consumed and dominated. A

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective