Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The present moment is necessary: whatever is actually the... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→When a false positum conflicts with the present moment, the possibility it describes must be referred to some other time, not the present.

    The present moment is necessary: whatever is actually the case now cannot simultaneously be otherwise.

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & Possibility

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A false positum (e.g., 'you are running') that contradicts the present state of ...If you are standing now, you cannot also be running now.Possibility requires an accessible time at which the described state of affairs ...When a false positum conflicts with the present moment, the possibility it descr...

    Similar

    The present moment ('now') possesses two distinct parts or aspects des...85%The present moment exists only as a boundary between past and future.83%When a false positum conflicts with the present moment, the possibilit...79%Not everything possible happens, so not everything that happens is nec...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: obligationes
    View source passageHide passage
    Time and modality. When discussing modalities in his Ordinatio (I, d. 38, 2), John Duns Scotus rejects a principle which he calls an obligational rule, namely that with a false positio one must “deny the present instant”. And in fact, Walter Burley (writing roughly at the same time) mentions this as a valid, useful rule. The reasoning behind the rule is the necessity of the present. For example, suppose “you are running” is the false positum when you are in fact standing in a university hall and

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective